Email this article 
Information interaction within the triad: pregnant woman—physician—pharmacist
- Authors: Shkirando Y.V.1, Gribkova E.I.1,2, Polykovskaya A.A.2
- Affiliations:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba, Moscow, Russia
- Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
- Issue: No 1 (2026)
- Pages: 45-50
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://remedium-journal.ru/journal/article/view/1861
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.32687/1561-5936-2026-30-1-45-50
- Cite item
Abstract
Currently, the project "Strategy of Actions for the Implementation of Family and Demographic Policy, Support of Large Families in the Russian Federation" is being developed in the territory of the Russian Federation. One of the objectives of this project is to stimulate women to have children, including through the provision of various benefits, as well as effective, high-quality and safe pharmaceutical care. The interaction of the patient, which in this study is a pregnant woman, with a doctor and a pharmaceutical specialist is an important integral part of receiving any medical and pharmaceutical care, which determines the relevance of this study, the results of which are presented in the article. This article is devoted to the study of information interaction within the triad comprising a pregnant woman, a physician and a pharmacist. The specific features of communicative interaction among the participants of the triad were examined, and gaps in this communication were identified.
About the authors
Yuliia V. Shkirando
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba, Moscow, Russia
Email: julansi@rambler.ru
Elena I. Gribkova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba, Moscow, Russia; Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Email: gribkova_ei@pfur.ru
Alexandra A. Polykovskaya
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Email: 003
References
- GBD 2021 Fertility and Forecasting Collaborators. Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950—2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403(10440):2057—2099.
- Im H. B., Hwang J. H., Choi D., Choi S. J. Patient-physician communication on herbal medicine use during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2024;9(3):e013412. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013412
- Proskurina N. V., Bakanach O. V., Repina E. G. Methods of sample surveys: practical manual. Samara; 2019. 98 p. (In Russ.)
- Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V. A., Berry L. L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J Mark. 1985;49(4):41—50. doi: 10.1177/002224298504900403
- Filippova O. V., Pyatigorskaya N. V. Pharmacy worker as a factor influencing female reproductive health. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2020;14(5):619—629. doi: 10.17749/2313—7347/ob.gyn.rep.2020.113 (In Russ.)
- Aparicio E., Jardí C., Bedmar C., et al. Nutrient intake during pregnancy and post-partum: ECLIPSES study. Nutrients. 2020;12(5):1325. doi: 10.3390/nu12051325
- Davari M., Khorasani E., Tigabu B. M. Factors influencing prescribing decisions of physicians: a review. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018;28(6):795—804. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v28i6.15
- Jackson H., Grzeskowiak L. E., Enticott J., Callander E. Pharmacoepidemiology and costs of medications dispensed during pregnancy: a retrospective population-based study. BJOG. 2023;130(11):1317—1327. doi: 10.1111/1471—0528.17472
