Email this article 
Organization of national diabetes registers based on the examples of a several Western countries
- Authors: Andreev D.A.1, Timoshevsky A.A.1
- Affiliations:
- Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management, Moscow, Russia
- Issue: No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 263-268
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://remedium-journal.ru/journal/article/view/1755
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.32687/1561-5936-2024-28-3-263-268
- Cite item
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) registries are effective tools for monitoring the quality of treatment, including assessing the implementation of medication prescriptions and the implementation of models for the prevention of complications. The article examines the basic principles of the structural organization of national DM registers in a number of Western countries. It was noted that further standardization of sets of registered parameters in medical information databases will contribute to the development of methods for conducting comparative assessments of the effectiveness of DM therapy in everyday clinical practice.
About the authors
Dmitry A. Andreev
Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management, Moscow, Russia
Email: andreevda@zdrav.mos.ru
Alexander A. Timoshevsky
Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management, Moscow, Russia
Email: timoshevskijaa@zdrav.mos.ru
References
- Sarfo J. O., Obeng P., Kyereh H. K. et al. Self-determination theory and quality of life of adults with diabetes: a scoping review. J. Diabetes Res. 2023;2023:5341656. doi: 10.1155/2023/534165
- Bak J. C.G., Serné E. H., Kramer M. H.H. et al. National diabetes registries: do they make a difference? Acta Diabetol. 2021;58:267–278. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01576-8
- Hermans M. P., Elisaf M., Michel G. et al. Benchmarking is associated with improved quality of care in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3388–3395. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1853
- Bak J. C.G., Serné E. H., Wouters M. W.J.M. et al. Potency of quality indicators in Dutch and international diabetes registries. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2024;18:102920. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102920
- Emslie-Smith A. The SCI-DC system: helping to improve diabetes outcomes in Scotland. Diabetes Prim. Care 2010;12:142–150.
- Biester T., Schwandt A., Heidtmann B. et al. Declining frequency of acute complications associated with tubeless insulin pump use: data from 2,911 patients in the German/Austrian Diabetes Patienten Verlaufsdokumentation Registry. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2021;23:527–536. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0675
- Warncke K., Eckert A., Bonifacio E. et al. Characterisation and clinical outcomes in children and adolescents with diabetes according to newly defined subgroups: a cohort study from the DPV registry. EClinicalMedicine. 2023;64:102208. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102208
- Carstensen B., Kristensen J. K., Ottosen P., Borch-Johnsen K. The Danish National Diabetes Register: trends in incidence, prevalence and mortality. Diabetologia. 2008;51:2187–2196. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1156-z
- Jørgensen M. E., Kolding J., Reventlov Husted G. et al. The Danish Adult Diabetes Registry. Clin. Epidemiol. 2016;8:429–434. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S99518
- Bak J. C.G., Mul D., Serné E. H. et al. DPARD: rationale, design and initial results from the Dutch national diabetes registry. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2021;21:122. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00782-x
- Eliasson B., Gudbjörnsdottir S. Diabetes care — improvement through measurement. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2014;106:S291–S294. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8227(14)70732-6
- Beck N., van Bommel A. C., Eddes E. H. et al. The Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing: achieving Codman’s dream on a nationwide basis. Ann. Surg. 2020;271:627–631. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003665
- Cooper J. G., Thue G., Claudi T. et al. The Norwegian Diabetes Register for Adults — an overview of the first years. Nor. Epidemiol. 2013;23(1):29–34. doi: 10.5324/nje.v23i1.1599
- Skrivarhaug T. Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry: childhood onset diabetes in Norway 1973–2012. Nor. Epidemiol. 2013;23(1):23–27. doi: 10.5324/nje.v23i1.1598
- Arnold S. V., Gosch K., Kosiborod M. et al. Contemporary use of cardiovascular risk reduction strategies in type 2 diabetes. Insights from the diabetes collaborative registry. Am. Heart J. 2023;263:104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.05.002
- Arnold S. V., Inzucchi S. E., McGuire D. K. et al. Evaluating the quality of comprehensive cardiometabolic care for patients with type 2 diabetes in the U.S.: The Diabetes Collaborative Registry. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:e99–e101. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0585
- Lind M., Olsson M., Rosengren A. et al. The relationship between glycaemic control and heart failure in 83,021 patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2012;55:2946–53. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2681-3
