<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1d1" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">REMEDIUM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>REMEDIUM</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1561-5936</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2658-3534</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Joint-Stock Company Chicot</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">955</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21518/1561-5936-2020-4-5-6-92-94</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Medical devices market: main factors in the osteosynthesis devices market</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vanin</surname><given-names>Aleksey</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff-1">MDpro</aff><pub-date date-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2020-12-04" publication-format="electronic"><day>04</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><issue>4-6</issue><fpage>92</fpage><lpage>94</lpage><history><pub-date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-03-18"><day>18</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></pub-date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2020,</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year></permissions><abstract>The market research has been conducted using information on public procurement of osteosynthesis devices and the export-import transaction database of the official customs statistics. In the article, the term “osteosynthesis devices” is used to indicate the medical devices of this type. The purchase of such devices is most important to meet the needs of the public health system.The osteosynthesis implants consumption in value terms amounted to RUB 4.530 bil. in 2018. For the purposes of research, the regional groups of manufacturers of these products such as EU&amp;US, Asian and Locals were identified.The Asian group manufacturers - 33% and Locals - 24% showed outperforming growth rates over the period from 2015 to 2018. The increase in the supplies of EU&amp;US group manufacturers - 12% is below the market average figures. At the same time, a significant EU&amp;US supplies gain was reported from 2017 to 2018. In 2018, a supplies gain for EU&amp;US group accounted for more than 30%, as compared to 2017.According to MDpro, the total consumption of traumatology and orthopaedic devices amounted to about RUB 23.8 bil. at final prices in 2018. Of which, public procurement amounted to about RUB 22.1 bil., i.e. 92.7% of total consumption. Osteosynthesis implants make the greatest contribution to the private consumption. The share of Russian products in the domestic market of traumatology and orthopedic devices in2018 amounted to approximately 13% or about RUB 3.1 bil. at final prices.</abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>medical industry</kwd><kwd>osteosynthesis</kwd><kwd>implants</kwd><kwd>shafts</kwd><kwd>plates</kwd><kwd>market</kwd><kwd>research</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>медицинская промышленность</kwd><kwd>остеосинтез</kwd><kwd>импланты</kwd><kwd>стержни</kwd><kwd>пластины</kwd><kwd>рынок</kwd><kwd>анализ</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back/></article>
