REMEDIUMREMEDIUM1561-59362658-3534Joint-Stock Company Chicot186210.32687/1561-5936-2026-30-1-51-57Original ArticleAssessment of the degree of patient satisfaction with the quality of medical care at the Research Institute of Pulmonology of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of RussiaMisharinViktor M.secretary@pulmonology-fmba.ruGorbunkovStanislav D.sdgorbunkov@mail.ruSuvorovaSvetlana A.suvorovasa1975@yandex.ruBilichenkoTatiana N.tbilichenko@yandex.ruBystritskayaElena V.bystritskaia@yandex.ruResearch Institute of Pulmonology of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia30032026301515723032026Copyright © 2026,2026Background. The patients satisfaction assessment based on an anonymous questionnaire is an essential component of managing the quality of medical services of the medical organization. The aim: to study the indicators of satisfaction with the quality and availability of medical services provided in a medical institution, according to an anonymous survey of patients to improve the system of organizing medical care (МС) in the profile of pulmonology. Materials and methods. Original questionnaires were developed for an anonymous survey of patients who applied for outpatient and hospital MС. The survey was conducted among 289 patients, of which 84 people those who applied for an outpatient appointment with a specialist at the Clinical Diagnostic Center (CDC) and 205 people from clinical departments (СD) for the period from 01.06.2025 to 30.06.2025 years. Statistical processing of questionnaire data was carried out using the Statistica (version 10), Epinfo (version 7) software package. To assess the differences in qualitative parameters in the two compared groups, the Mentel–Henszel test χ2 was used. The differences between the two indicators with the level of significance p lt; 0,05 were considered significant. Results. High ratings of patient satisfaction with the medical care (MC) provided, as well as stay in the consultative and diagnostic center and departments of the clinic of the Federal State Budgetary Institution Research Institute of Pulmonology FMBA of Russia were established. The indicators good and excellent were indicated in the CDC by 93.9% of respondents and in CDs — 98.1%. The patients sent 31 proposals to the Administration of the Institute to improve the medical services provided. Conclusions. Anonymous questioning of patients is an effective method for obtaining information on the quality of MC and medical services in order to improve the activities of a medical institution.questionnairesquality of medical caresatisfaction with medical careorganization of medical careанонимное анкетирование, качество медицинской помощи, удовлетворенность медицинской помощью, организация медицинской помощи1.Aksenova E. I., Besschetnova O. V. Indicators of the availability and quality of medical care, ensuring the satisfaction of the population with medical care in various countries of the world. Expert review. Moscow; 2021. 40 p. (In Russ.)2.Jenkinson C., Coulter A., Bruster S. The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: development and validation using data from inpatient surveys in five countries. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2002;14(5):353—358. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.5.3533.Tatarnikov M. A. Quality management of medical care. Moscow; 2016. 304 p. (In Russ.)4.Al-Abri R., Al-Balushi A. Patient satisfaction survey as a tool towards quality improvement. Oman Medical Journal. 2014;29(1):3—7. doi: 10.5001/omj.2014.025.Price R. A., Elliott M. N., Zaslavsky A. M., et al. Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality. Medical Care Research and Review. 2014;71(5):522—554. doi: 10.1177/10775587145414806.Batbaatar E., Dorjdagva J., Luvsannyam A., et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Perspectives in Public Health. 2017;137(2):89—101. doi: 10.1177/17579139166341367.Luxford K., Safran D. G., Delbanco T. Promoting patient-centered care: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experience. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2015;27(6):510—515. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr0248.Nilsson L., Hofflander M., Eriksén S., Borg C. The importance of interaction in the implementation of information technology in health care: a study of the medication process. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2016;16(1):35. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2012.7106839.Mosadeghrad A. M. Factors influencing healthcare service quality. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2014;3(2):77—89. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.6510.Manary M. P., Boulding W., Staelin R., Glickman S. W. The patient experience and health outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;368(3):201—203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp121177511.Nazarova I. B. Patient satisfaction with the quality of medical care in the capital's polyclinics. Population. 2025;28(2):96—104. doi: 10.24412/1561-7785-2025-2-96-104 (In Russ.)12.Buzin V. N., Mikhaylova Yu. V., Buzina T. S., et al. Russian healthcare through the eyes of the population: dynamics of satisfaction over the past 14 years (2006—2019): review of sociological studies. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2020;23(3):42—47. doi: 10.17116/profmed20202303142. (In Russ.)