REMEDIUMREMEDIUM1561-59362658-3534Joint-Stock Company Chicot178310.32687/1561-5936-2025-29-2-195-199Original ArticleOn the prevalence of contact dermatitis among health workers in different countriesСадыковаРомина Наилевнаsadykovaromina23@gmail.comШулаевАлексей Владимировичalexs_shu@mail.ruМингазоваЭльмира Нурисламовнаelmira_mingazova@mail.ruKazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, RussiaKazan Medical College, Kazan, RussiaKazan State Medical University, Kazan, RussiaKazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russian FederationRussian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia15122025219519917102025Copyright © 2025,2025It is known that contact dermatitis is more common among healthcare workers than among the general population (21% versus 10%, respectively). The prevalence of occupational contact dermatitis among healthcare workers in recent years has ranged from 12% to 65%. The average prevalence of contact dermatitis of the hands among healthcare workers has increased to date from 21.08% to 37.24% due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This pathology, as one of the most common occupational skin diseases and a socially significant health problem, can lead to loss of productivity, sick leave, decreased quality of work and life, and decreased job satisfaction. In light of the global shortage of medical personnel, issues of occupational safety, monitoring of skin condition, and surveying healthcare workers about skin pathologies before hiring are relevant.health workerscontact dermatitisprevalencehealthcare organizationshygiene and occupational safetyмедицинские работникиконтактный дерматитраспространённостьмедицинские организациигигиена и охрана труда[Rai R., El-Zaemey S., Dorji N. et al. Exposure to occupational hazards among health care workers in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18(5):2603. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052603][Prakoeswa C. R.S., Damayanti, Anggraeni S. et al. Glove-induced hand dermatitis: a study in healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Dermatol. Res. Pract. 2023;2023:6600382. DOI: 10.1155/2023/6600382][Parsons V., Williams H. C., English J et al. A self-report questionnaire to detect hand dermatitis in nurses. Occupational Med. 2020;70(9):645—648. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa188][van den Oord L. J., Naber R. J., van Manen B. C.T., Rustemeyer T. The prevalence of contact dermatitis among surgical assistants, anaesthesia assistants and anaesthesiologists working at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre. Contact Dermatitis. 2023;89(3):171—177. DOI: 10.1111/cod.14371][Mossel R. M., Naber R. J., van Manen B. C.T., Rustemeyer T. The prevalence of hand dermatitis among intensive care unit nurses. Contact Dermatitis. 2024;91(1):30—37. DOI: 10.1111/cod.14568][Omrane A., Amri C., Bouzgarrou L. et al. Nurses: workers particularly concerned by contact dermatitis in public hospital. Open J. Nurs. 2019;9:313—328. DOI: 10.4236/ojn.2019.93030][Gunasegaran J., Teh Y. Y., Lim C. K., Ng S. F. Review on prevalence, risk factors, and research advancements on the use of medical gloves concerning hand dermatitis among health care workers. Saf. Health Work. 2024;15(2):129—138. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2024.02.005][Jaber M., Prasad P. Self-reported allergic occupational contact dermatitis among dental healthcare professionals in United Arab Emirates — a cross sectional study. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2023;15(1):S513–S518. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_669_22][Tang H., Wang H., Hamblin M. R. et al. Contact dermatitis caused by prevention measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review. Front. Public Health. 2023;11:1189190. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1189190][Wiechens B., Meyer-Marcotty P., Buhl T. et al. Hand eczema symptoms, exposures and skin care in orthodontics: a national, cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-024-00524-3][Patel J., Gimeno Ruiz de Porras D., Mitchell L. E. et al. Cleaning tasks and products and asthma among health care professionals. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2024;66(1):28—34. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002990][Kramer A., Seifert J., Abele-Horn M. et al. S2k-Guideline hand antisepsis and hand hygiene. GMS Hyg. Infect. Control. 2024;19:Doc42. DOI: 10.3205/dgkh000497][Lin P., Zhu S., Huang Y. et al. Adverse skin reactions among healthcare workers during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak: a survey in Wuhan and its surrounding regions. Br. J. Dermatol. 2020;183(1):190—192. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19089][Khaertdinova L. A., Mingazova E. N., Glushko N. I., Malanicheva T. G. Analysis of skin microbiocenosis in children with atopic dermatitis. Kazan Medical Journal. 2005;86(6):489—490. (In Russ.)][Malanicheva T. G., Khaertdinova L. A., Mingazova E. N. A method for predicting the development of complicated forms of atopic dermatitis in children with secondary infection. Patent No. 2297797 C1 Russian Federation; 2005. (In Russ.)][Lovato M. J., Del Valle L. J., Puiggalí J., Franco L. Performance-enhancing materials in medical gloves. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023;14(7):349. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14070349][Thumwong A., Darachai J., Thamrongsiripak N. et al. Fruit peel powder as natural antioxidant and reinforcing bio-filler in natural rubber latex gloves: cases of mangosteen, pomelo and durian. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023;12(5):1119. DOI: 10.3390/antiox12051119][Delgado-Nungaray J. A., Grajeda-Arias D., Reynaga-Delgado E., Gonzalez-Reynoso O. Biodegradation of nitrile gloves as sole carbon source of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in liquid culture. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(8):1162. DOI: 10.3390/polym16081162][Rojruthai P., Sakdapipanich J., Wiriyanantawong J. et al. Effect of latex purification and accelerator types on rubber allergens prevalent in sulphur prevulcanized natural rubber latex: potential application for allergy-free natural rubber gloves. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(21):4679. DOI: 10.3390/polym14214679][Ngamchokwathana C., Chaiear N., Sakdapipanich J. et al. Reduced protein levels in latex gloves may play an alternative approach to lowering latex sensitization risks among health workers; a cross-sectional analytical study. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 2024;19(1):21. DOI: 10.1186/s12995-024-00420-x][Parisi C. A.S., Kelly K. J., Ansotegui I. J. et al. Update on latex allergy: new insights into an old problem. World Allergy Organ J. 2021;14(8):100569. DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100569][Arasi S., Barni S., Caminiti L. et al. Latex allergy in children. J. Clin. Med. 2023;13(1):124. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010124][Loverre T., Casella R., Miniello A. et al. Latex allergy — from discovery to component-resolved diagnosis. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets. 2024;24(5):541—548. DOI: 10.2174/1871530323666230901102131][Treudler R., Worm M., Bauer A. et al. Occupational anaphylaxis: a position paper of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI). Allergol Select. 2024;8:407—424. DOI: 10.5414/ALX02543E]