REMEDIUMREMEDIUM1561-59362658-3534Joint-Stock Company Chicot165210.32687/1561-5936-2023-27-3-277-281Original ArticleThe impact of digitalization of working conditions and content on the health of workersZudinAleksander B.zudin-ab@yandex.ruVvedenskiyArtem I.ai_vvedenskiy@mail.ruMelerzanovAleksander V.melerzanov.av@mopt.ruN. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health, Moscow, RussiaI. P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University, Ryazan, RussiaMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia15122023327728114102025Copyright © 2023,2023Introduction. The total and massive transition of industries, businesses and individual companies to digital technologies has led to the need to assess the impact of digitalization on the health of employees. Strategic decisions affecting business efficiency should take into account the state of the workforce, the ability of personnel to perceive and master digital transformations with the most environmentally friendly production climate that does not have a negative impact on the health (both physical and mental) of employees. The purpose of the work is to review foreign scientific research devoted to the analysis of the impact of digitalization on the health of workers. Materials and methods. The work was carried out by the method of content analysis of scientific papers published in foreign specialized publications on occupational medicine, public health and healthcare organization. Results. The study showed that the issue of the impact of digital transformation of working conditions and content on the health of workers in modern scientific literature is not given enough attention. The main research focuses are technostress and its consequences. This necessitates the development of further research and the development of applied recommendations to reduce the negative effects of digitalization on the health of workers.digitalizationlaborworkplacestaffhealthworkerstechnostressцифровизациятрудрабочее местоперсоналздоровьеработникитехностресс1.Bakker A. B., Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. J. Manag. Psychol. 2007;22:309—328.2.Bakker A. B., Demerouti E., Verbeke W. Using the job demands resources model to predict burnout and performance. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2004;43:83—104.3.Bakker A. B., Demerouti E., Euwema M. C. Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2005;10:170.4.Karasek R. A. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm. Sci. Q. 1979:285—308.5.Schwartz B. The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. N.Y., 2009.6.Lehner B. S., Jung J., Stieler-Lorenz B. et al. Is WDLR (wish for decision latitude reduction) linked to work engagement? An exploratory study among knowledge workers. JPR. 2013;3.7.Pfaff H. Optionsstress und Zeitdruck. In: Junghanns G., Morschhäuser M. (eds.) Immer Schneller, Immer Mehr: Psychische Belastung bei Wissens- und Dienstleistungsarbeit. Wiesbaden, 2013. P. 113—143.8.Rachinger M., Rauter R., Müller C. et al. Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2018;30(8):1143—1160.9.Fiedler S., Pfaff H., Soellner R., Pförtner T.-K. Exploring the association between health literacy and psychological well-being among industry managers in Germany. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2018;60:743—753.10.Nyberg A., Alfredsson L., Theorell T. et al. Managerial leadership and ischaemic heart disease among employees: the Swedish WOLF study. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2009;66:51—55.11.Peña-Casas R., Ghailani D. A European minimum wage framework: the solution to the ongoing increase in in-work poverty in Europe? Social policy in the European Union: state of play. 2020.12.Frey C. B., Osborne M. A. The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technol. Forecast Soc. 2017;114:254—280.13.Müller V. C., Bostrom N. Future progress in artificial intelligence: a survey of expert opinion. In: Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence. Cham, 2016:555—572.14.Rietzschel E. F., Slijkhuis M., Van Yperen N. W. Close monitoring as a contextual stimulator: How need for structure affects the relation between close monitoring and work outcomes. Eur. J. Work and Organizational Psychol. 2014;23(3):394—404.15.Grzywacz J. G., Casey P. R., Jones F. A. The effects of workplace flexibility on health behaviors: a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2007;49:1302—1309.16.Butler A. B., Grzywacz J. G., Ettner S. L., Liu B. Workplace flexibility, self-reported health, and health care utilization. Work Stress. 2009;23:45—59.17.Hill J. E., Jacob J. I., Shannon L. L. et al. Exploring the relationship of workplace flexibility, gender, and life stage to family-to-work conflict, and stress and burnout. Commun. Work Fam. 2008;11:165—181.18.Meyer S.-C., Hunefeld L. Challenging cognitive demands at work, related working conditions, and employee well-being. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:2911.