<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1d1" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">REMEDIUM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>REMEDIUM</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1561-5936</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2658-3534</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Joint-Stock Company Chicot</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1229</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21518/1561-5936-2018-4-40-47</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Risk sharing schemes based on cost-effectiveness of multiple sclerosis disease modifying drugs: foreign experience and the possibilities of its use in Russia</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tolkushin</surname><given-names>A. G.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kholovnya-Voloskova</surname><given-names>M. E.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Andreev</surname><given-names>D. A.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Khachanova</surname><given-names>N. V.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ermolaeva</surname><given-names>T. N.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Davydovskaya</surname><given-names>M. V.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kokushkin</surname><given-names>K. A.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff-1">Center for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Medical Technologies</aff><aff id="aff-2">N.I.Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University</aff><pub-date date-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2018-12-04" publication-format="electronic"><day>04</day><month>12</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><fpage>40</fpage><lpage>47</lpage><history><pub-date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-03-18"><day>18</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></pub-date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2018,</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year></permissions><abstract>The article presents the experience of introducing risk-sharing schemes (RSSs) in the UK and the US, while providing patients with multiple sclerosis disease modifying drugs (MSDMD). The authors assessed the possibility of using some elements of foreign RSSs on the territory of Russia. In particular, it was suggested to use specific criteria for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of the MSDMD, which were tracked within the framework of the RSSs in the USA (the fact of aggravation of multiple sclerosis, refusal to continue therapy, etc.), and to introduce the RSSs by issuing an administrative document, as was done by the UK Health Department.</abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>risk sharing schemes (RSSs)</kwd><kwd>innovative methods of pharmacological support (IMPS)</kwd><kwd>multiple sclerosis disease modifying drugs (MSDMD)</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>схемы разделения рисков (СРР)</kwd><kwd>инновационные методы лекарственного обеспечения (ИМЛО)</kwd><kwd>препараты</kwd><kwd>изменяющие течение рассеянного склероза (ПИТРС)</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Преимущества, получаемые в результате внедрения СРР, превосходят возможные сложности.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>На предварительном этапе, перед разработкой и внедрением СРР, в результате комплексной оценки необходимо получить обоснованный ответ о выборе лекарственного препарата, почему именно этот лекарственный препарат следует выбрать для СРР, какова его стоимость (затратность) и результативность (ценность).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>При разработке и внедрении СРР для обеспечения ПИТРС на территории России может быть использован зарубежный опыт: На этапе разработки при определении критериев результативности терапии рассеянного склероза, методов их оценки и мониторинга, временных интервалов и размеров компенсаций в случае неблагоприятных исходов может быть применен опыт США. На этапе внедрения - опыт Великобритании: издание распорядительного открытого ведомственного нормативно-правового акта (приказа, циркуляра, распоряжения) с детальным описанием СРР.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Толкушин А.Г Сравнительное фармакоэкономическое исследование препаратов, изменяющих течение рассеянного склероза (Авонекс, Бетаферон, Ребиф, Копаксон). Фармакоэкономика, 2008, 1: 18-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Мкртчян В.Р, Брылев Л.В., Давыдова О.В. и др. Фармакоэкономический анализ применения лекарственных средств первой и второй линии в лечении рассеянного склероза. Неврология, нейропсихиатрия, психосоматика, 2015, 7 (3): 35-39. 3. Евдошенко Е.П., Солодун И.Ю., Башлакова Е.Е., Холовня М.А. Анализ влияния предлагаемого включения препарата терифлуномид (абаджио) в программу «7 высокозатратных нозологий» на бюджеты федеральных и региональных органов государственной власти РФ в сфере охраны здоровья для обеспечения лиц, больных РС. Фармакоэкономика: теория и практика, 2016, 4 (2): 5-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Борковски Л., Солодун И.Ю., Холовня М.А., Евдошенко Е.П. Использование инструментов разделения рисков и процедур раннего доступа к лечению в Европейском союзе. Проблемы стандартизации в здравоохранении, 2016, 9-10: 3-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Попович Л.Д. Анализ мирового опыта внедрения моделей разделения рисков (Risk-sharing schemes) для повышения доступности инновационной лекарственной терапии. Журнал Кремлевская медицина. Клинический вестник, 2013, 2: 8-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Мельникова Л.С., Федяев Д.В., Герасимова К.В. Инновационные методы лекарственного обеспечения: соглашения о разделении рисков. Злокачественные опухоли, 2016, 4 (спецвыпуск 1): 99-102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Garrison LP Jr, Towse A, Briggs A, de Pouvourville G et al. Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements-good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements task force. Value Health, 2013 Jul-Aug, 16 (5): 703-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Schuler Ch, Faulker LP Pay For Play. The latest wrinkle in pharma contracting? Deals that share risks between manufacturers and payers and focus on patient outcomes. Here's a look at the state of the art - and what to expect as these deals gain traction. Pharmaceutical Executive, 2009 Jun 01. http:wwwpharmexec.com/pay-play-0? id=&amp;sk=&amp;date=&amp;pageID=2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Распоряжение Правительства РФ от 30.01.2015 № 136-р «О реализации в 2015-2016 годах на территории Российской Федерации пилотных проектов, направленных на модернизацию системы лекарственного обеспечения отдельных категорий граждан».</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Carlson JJ, Chen S, Garrison LP Jr. Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements: An Updated International Review. Pharmacoeconomics, 2017 Oct, 35 (10): 1063-1072.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Beta Interferon and Glatiramer Acetate for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. Technology appraisal guidance TA32. 2002. URL: www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/TA32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Department of Health. Cost Effective Provision of Disease Modifying Therapies for People with Multiple Sclerosis. HSC 2002/004. 2002. URL: http:webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk /20130107105354/httpwww. dh.gov.uk / en / Publicationsandstatistics / Lettersandcirculars / Healthservicec irculars /DH_4004 3 32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Tappenden P, Chilcot J, O'Hagan T, McCabe C et al. Cost Effectiveness of Beta Interferons and Glatiramer Acetate in the Management of Multiple Sclerosis: Final Report to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. London: NICE. 2001. URL: www.nice.org.uk /guidance /ta32/resources / assessment-report-on-the-use-of-beta-interferon-and-glatiramer-ace-tatefor-multiple-sclerosis-scharr-report2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Chilcott J, McCabe C, Tappenden P, Cooper NJ, Abrams K, Claxton K. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the management of multiple sclerosis. BMJ, 2003, 326: 522-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Hemmett L, Holmes J, Barnes M, Russell N. What drives quality of life in multiple sclerosis? QjM, 2004, 97: 671-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Kobelt G, Lindgren P, Parkin D, Francis DA et al. Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. A cross-sectional observational study in the UK. Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics. 2000. 35 p. http:swopec.hhs.se /hastef/papers /hastef0398.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Scalfari A, Neuhaus A, Degenhardt A, Rice GP et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study 10: relapses and long-term disability. Brain, 2010, 133: 1914-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Бойко А.Н., Мугутдинова Б.Т., Гусев Е.И. Спектр нейропсихологических нарушений и прогноз течения заболевания на протяжении 5 лет у больных с типичным ремиттирующим рассеянным склерозом. Известия ДГПУ. Естественные и точные науки, 2014, 2 (27).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Pickin M, Cooper CL, Chater T, O'Hagan A, et al. The Multiple Sclerosis Risk Sharing Scheme Monitoring Studyearly results and lessons for the future. BMC Neurol, 2009 Jan 6: 9-1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Boggild M, Palace J, Barton P, Ben-Shlomo Y, Bregenzer T, Dobson C, et al. Multiple sclerosis risk sharing scheme: two year results of clinical cohort study with historical comparator. BMJ, 2009, 339: b4677.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Warlow C. Not such a bright idea: the UK risk sharing scheme for beta interferon and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis. Pract Neurol, 2003, 3: 194-195.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Raftery J. Multiple sclerosis risk sharing scheme: A costly failure. BMJ, 2010, 340: 1672.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Sudlow S, Counsel C. Problems with UK government's risk sharing scheme for assessing drugs for multiple sclerosis. BMJ, 2003, 326: 288-92.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Adamski J, Godman B, Ofierska-Sujkowska G, Osinska B, et al. Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers. BMC Health Serv Res, 2010 Jun 7, 10: 153.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Palace J, Bregenzer T, Tremlett H, et al. UK multiple sclerosis riskshar-ing scheme: a new natural history dataset and an improved Markov model. BMJ Open, 2014, 4: e004073.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Palace J, Duddy M, Bregenzer T, Lawton M, Zhu F et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the UK Multiple Sclerosis Risk Sharing Scheme at 6 years: a clinical cohort study with natural history comparator. Lancet Neurol, 2015 May, 14 (5): 497-505.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Melendez-Torres GJ, Auguste P, Armoiry X, Maheswaran H et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of beta-interferon and glatiramer acetate for treating multiple sclerosis: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess, 2017 Sep, 21 (52): 1-352.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Shearer L, Nayer, Vogenberg, Rubinstein. CIGNA Signs Outcomes-Based Contract That May Be First Deal for Specialty Drug. Specialty Pharmacy News, 2011 April, 8 (Issue 4). https:aishealth.com/archive/nspn0411-01.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Shearer Lindsay. CIGNA AND EMD SERONO TEAM TO FIGHT MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS UNDER FIRST OUTCOMES-BASED SPECIALTY MEDICATION CONTRACT (16 March 2011). httpswww.precigna. com /newsroom /news-releases/2011 /cigna-and-emd-serono-team-to-fight-multiple-sclerosis-under-first-outcomes-based-specialty-medication-contract.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Eldred Karen. CIGNA RECEIVES EXCELLENCE AWARD FOR USING OUTCOMES-BASED CONTRACTING AS A STRATEGY TO HELP MANAGE PRESCRIPTION DRUG COSTS (07 March 2017). httpswww.cigna. com / newsroom / news-releases /2017 / cigna-receives-excellence-awardfor-using-outcomes-based-contracting-as-a-strategy-to-help-manageprescription-drug-costs.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Hernandez Randi. Prime Therapeutics and EMD Serono Team Up for Outcomes-Based Rebate Project Speciality Pharmacy Times - March 08, 2012. https:www.specialtypharmacytimes.com /news /prime-therapeutics-and-emd-serono-team-up-for-outcomes-based-rebate-project.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Thelemann Sh. Prime Therapeutics Announces CareCentered Contract™ with EMD Serono, Inc. for MS Drug Rebif®. True outcomes-based assessment of Rebif within Prime's integrated model. Mar 07, 2012. https:www.prnewswire.com / news-releases / prime-therapeutics-announces-carecentered-contract-with-emd-serono-inc-for-ms-drug-rebif-141779863. html.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Roland D. Novartis looks at ways to win over health insurers. MarketWatch, 2015 July 10. Available at: http:www.marketwatch. com / story/novartis-looks-at-ways-to-win-over-health-insur-ers-2015-07-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Abarca Health Announces Innovative Value-Based Contract With Biogen For Multiple Sclerosis Therapies, 2017 Jul 28. https:wwwprnews-wire.com / news-releases / abarca-health-announces-innovative-value-based-contract-with-biogen-for-multiple-sclerosis-therapies-300495968.html.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Kelly Cathy. Biogen Ventures Into Value-Based Contracts In Multiple Sclerosis (10 Aug 2017) https:pharmaintelligence.informa.com/resourc-es / product-content /value-based-contracts.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Yu JS, Chin L, Oh J, Farias J. Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements for Pharmaceutical Products in the United States: A Systematic Review. J Manag Care Spec Pharm, 2017 Oct 23, 10: 10281040.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Федеральный закон от 05.04.2013 № 44-ФЗ «О контрактной системе в сфере закупок товаров, работ, услуг для обеспечения государственных и муниципальных нужд».</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Мицкевич Л.А. Очерки теории административного права: современное наполнение. Монография. М.: «Издательство «Проспект», 2015. 285 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Иванова А. Клиники «Медси» вернут деньги пациентам, больным гепатитом С, если лечение им не поможет. Другие участники рынка пока не готовы к таким рискам. Ведомости, 07 февраля 2017 https:www.vedomosti.ru /business /articles /2017/02/07/676432-kliniki-medsi.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
