Humanities research in pharma and the idea of the «competent consumer». Communication 1: International context

Abstract


This article outlines the landscape of an emerging academic field and enables readers to trace the genesis of Pharmaceutical Humanities. The article problematizes the model of the competent or rational consumer (health-literate patient, informed consumer, activated patient, responsible self-medicator), which is central to the constitution of this discipline. In this first communication, the authors analyze the impulses toward autonomization, key conceptual challenges, and analytical practices characteristic of pharmaceutical humanities.

About the authors

Elena A. Vishlenkova

Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Email: vishlenkovaelena@gmail.com

Sergey N. Zatravkin

N. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health, Moscow, Russia

Email: zatravkine@mail.ru

References

  1. Tsai T. I., Yu W. R., Lee S. D. Is health literacy associated with greater medical care trust? Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2018;30(7):514—519.
  2. Wiedermann C. J., Barbieri V., Lombardo S. et al. Health information use and trust: the role of health literacy and patient activation in a multilingual European region. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2025;22:570. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040570
  3. Ross J. S., Gross C. P., Krumholz H. M. Promoting transparency in pharmaceutical industry-sponsored research. Am. J. Public Health. 2012;102(1):72—80.
  4. Brenner L. H., Brenner A. T., Horowitz D. Beyond informed consent: educating the patient. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009;467:348—351.
  5. Thompson A. Trust, transparency, and accountability in health and pharmaceutical systems. J. Pharm. Health Serv. Res. 2025;16(1).
  6. Fox N. J., Ward K. J. Pharma in the bedroom… and the kitchen… The pharmaceuticalisation of daily life. Sociol. Health Illn. 2008;30(6):856—868.
  7. Dumit J. Drugs for Life: How Pharmaceutical Companies Define Our Health. Durham; 2012.
  8. Banerjee M., Efferth T. Pharmaceutical humanities and narrative pharmacy: an emerging new concept in pharmacy. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18(1):48. doi: 10.3390/ph18010048
  9. Nichter M. Pharmaceuticals, the commodification of health, and the health care-medicine use transition. In: Anthropology and International Health. Asian Case Studies. Amsterdam; 1996:271—272.
  10. Williams S. J., Martin P., Gabe J. The pharmaceuticalisation of society? A framework for analysis. Sociol. Health Illn. 2011;33(5):710—725.
  11. Pokida A. N., Zybunovskaya N. V. Practice of self-medication among the Russian population in modern conditions. Zdorove Naseleniya i Sreda Obitaniya. 2023;31(2):15—26. doi: 10.35627/2219—5238/2023-31-2-15-26 (In Russ.)
  12. Savin S. V., Smirnova A. N. Preventive medicine in Russia: the problem of public (dis)trust. Vestn. Sankt-Peterb. Univ. Sociol. 2022;15(4):405—423. doi: 10.21638/spbu12.2022.406 (In Russ.)
  13. Aksenova E. I., Kamynina N. N., Turzin P. S., Lukichev K. E. The phenomenon of self-medication: domestic and foreign experience. Byull. NII Obshchestv. Zdorovya im. N. A. Semashko. 2025;(2):106—111. doi: 10.69541/NRIPH.2025.02.019 (In Russ.)
  14. WHO Guideline on Self-Care Interventions for Health and Well-Being. 2022 Revision. Geneva; 2022.
  15. Noone J., Blanchette C. M. The value of self-medication: summary of existing evidence. J. Med. Econ. 2018;21(2):201—211.
  16. Muflih S. M., Bashir H. N., Khader Y. S., Karasneh R. A. The impact of health literacy on self-medication: a cross-sectional outpatient study. J. Public Health (Oxf.). 2022;44(1):84—91. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa188
  17. Amlaev K. R., Dakhbilgova Kh. A. Health literacy: concept, classifications, assessment methods. Vrach. 2018;29(6):83—86. doi: 10.29296/25877305-2018-06-19 (In Russ.)
  18. Vyatkina N. A. The level of medical literacy of Russian patients as assessed by physicians. Sib. Istor. Issled. 2019;(4):162—179. doi: 10.17223/2312461X/26/8 (In Russ.)
  19. Amlaev K. R., Muravyeva V. N., Koychuev A. A., Utkina G. Yu. Medical literacy (competence): current state of the problem, assessment methods, techniques for improving patient health literacy. Med. Vestn. Severn. Kavkaza. 2012;(4):75—79. doi: 10.29296/25877305-2018-06-19 (In Russ.)
  20. Zatravkin S. N., Vishlenkova E. A., Genin F. V. Own game: the history of the pharmaceutical market in Russia. Moscow; 2025. (In Russ.)
  21. Howick J., Zhao L., McKaig B. et al. Do medical schools teach medical humanities? Review of curricula in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2022;28:86—92. doi: 10.1111/jep.13589
  22. Ahlzén R. Narrativity and medicine: some critical reflections. Philos. Ethics Humanit. Med. 2019;14:9.
  23. Williams S. J., Gabe J., Davis P. The sociology of pharmaceuticals: progress and prospects. Sociol. Health Illn. 2008;30(6):813—824.
  24. Stotz K., Griffiths P. Biohumanities: rethinking the relationship between biosciences, philosophy and history of science, and society. Q. Rev. Biol. 2008;83:1.
  25. Teo T. From psychological science to the psychological humanities: building a general theory of subjectivity. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2017;21:281—291.
  26. Berger B. A. Communication Skills for Pharmacists: Building Relationships, Improving Patient Care. Washington; 2002.
  27. Bissell P., Ryan K., Morecroft C. Narratives about illness and medication: a neglected theme/new methodology within pharmacy practice research. Part I: conceptual framework. Pharm. World Sci. 2006;28:54—60.
  28. Zimmermann M. Integrating medical humanities into a pharmaceutical care seminar on dementia. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2013;77(1):1—8.
  29. Vishlenkova E. A., Zatravkin S. N. History of Russian pharma as a new research field. In: Professional identity and self-consciousness of the historian. To the anniversary of L. P. Repina. Vorobyova O. V., editor. Moscow; 2022:386—389. (In Russ.)
  30. Torday J. S., Miller W. B. The resolution of ambiguity as the basis for life: a cellular bridge between Western reductionism and Eastern holism. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2017;131:288—297. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.07.013

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 103

PDF (Russian) - 39

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2026 АО "Шико"

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mailing Address

Address: 105064, Moscow, st. Vorontsovo Pole, 12, building 1

Email: redactor@remedium-journal.ru

Phone: +7(495) 917-48-86



Principal Contact

Sherstneva Elena Vladimirovna
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
FSSBI «N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health»

105064, Vorontsovo Pole st., 12, Moscow


Email: redactor@remedium-journal.ru

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies